U.S.: Sinking of South Korean Ship Not Terrorism
Tuesday, June 29th, 2010The United States will not return North Korea to its list of state sponsors of terrorism over their role in sinking a South Korean ship:
“In our view, it was a provocative action but one taken by the military or the state against the military of another state,” U.S. Assistant Secretary of State Philip Crowley said Monday in his explanation of why the sinking didn’t constitute an act of international terrorism.
When asked if the sinking was an “act of war,” Crowley called it a “violation of the existing armistice between North and South,” adding the United States continuously evaluates information that may affect the status of nations on the terror list.
Legally, this is true: sinking a military ship does not constitute terrorism, which is defined by the deliberate targeting of civilians. For some bizarre reason, North Korea was removed from the state sponsors of terrorism list by George W. Bush in what was obviously a mistake.
The attack clearly was an act of war, however, but I can understand why Crowley, for diplomatic reasons, might not want to explicitly state this.





















































































King Seojong
















